Close
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
The Social Adviser

The Social Adviser

More Profit, Purpose, Fun!

  • Community
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Social Hub Login

Don’t be anti-social

August 6, 2013 By Baz Gardner

As published in Financial Planning Magazine, August edition.

In this article, I am going to explain why most of the ‘social media elite’ set an example that, if followed as a financial adviser, will largely ensure that your time and effort produce a poor return.

I was on Twitter last night and was immersing myself in the flow of tweets and information. As I often do, I attempted to engage with the authors of some interesting articles, tweeters of quotes and curators of information.

Yet like so often is the case, none replied or engaged. Now I should point out that I follow a mix of active advisers, some advisers who are still relatively inactive on their Twitter accounts, and the social media elite that I am referring to here.

These expert bloggers, speakers, authors and ‘Twitter aficionados’ blast out a constant stream of information into the ‘Twittersphere’, on their LinkedIn profiles and Facebook pages, and yet will very rarely respond or engage with comments on anything more than a cursory level.

Yet as a professional adviser, the entire purpose of your social media activity is to engage in direct and personal conversation, otherwise your conversion of audience to clients will be poor at best.

So, here are my ‘Top 4’ reasons why the social media elite are actually anti-social (and how you can avoid making the same mistakes). This is because:

1. These experts are primarily tweeting via automated systems with pre-written tweets or posts designed to distribute their output of social media love at optimal and consistent times. This means that there is no one actually there to engage when the account is tweeting. As an adviser, I would recommend going with the ‘post less, engage more’ strategy.

2. They have so many followers that they couldn’t possibly respond to every ‘nobody’ who tweets, posts or sends a message to them. As an adviser, I would always recommend only attempting to influence (i.e. have follow or connect to you) people who you actually want to have as clients, or for simplicity, shoot for quality over quantity.

3. They do not know how to design people process to ensure they have the time and ability to actually be social with followers. Make sure you have systems in place so that engagement is your primary purpose. If you do, you will not need many followers to start actually taking on new clients. Remember, you do not always have to be the person to respond. I have a whole team of people who help to make sure the large numbers of daily interactions I personally generate don’t get ‘lost’.

4. They have evolved from the marketing profession where the priority is ‘impressions’ and ‘distribution’ before gaining conversion and clients.

As a professional, think of this more as networking and relationship building than as marketing. Marketing generally takes a ‘mass market’ approach where it is all about reaching enough eyeballs, so that the low conversion it generates is still effective. However, you should be far more focused on discussion, conversation and building trust. Remember, it is not about having the most followers, just the right ones!

Take care and actually be social.

Facebook Comments
Share the Love

Primary Sidebar

TUNE INTO THE PODCAST

WANT INSTANT COOL STUFF?

  • Hidden

FOLLOW US

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

RECENT POSTS

The Exceptional Advice Show Ep. 7 – Conscious vs Subconscious Communication

By Baz Gardner

The Exceptional Advice Show Ep. 6 – Crypto for Advisers

By Baz Gardner

The Exceptional Advice Show Ep. 5 – Exceptional Advice and Being a Lawyer

By Baz Gardner

ARCHIVES

  • February 2022
  • October 2021
  • July 2021
  • September 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • August 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • October 2012
  • September 2012

Copyright © 2020

Privacy Policy